The widening strategic gap between Chinese and U.S. approaches to Large Language Models
Open Source vs. Proprietary Models
Recent AI developments underscore a widening strategic gap between Chinese and U.S. approaches to advanced large language models (LLMs).
Notably:
- Moonshot AI (Beijing) released Kimi K2, a trillion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model, reportedly surpassing GPT-4.1 in coding and math benchmarks, and crucially, making it open source.
- OpenAI (San Francisco) postponed the release of its anticipated “open-weight” model, attributing the delay to extended safety reviews.
Chinese firms are leaning aggressively into open releases, sharing model weights freely to encourage rapid adoption and enable broad experimentation. This tactic is intended to grow developer ecosystems and accelerate both innovation and feedback cycles.
Leading U.S. AI companies are showing increased hesitation, tightening access to model weights and intellectual property. OpenAI’s latest delay follows broader industry reticence to release high-performing models without restrictive licensing or additional vetting.
Impact on competition
The tradition of proprietary “AI moats” may be eroding as China’s open-weight models gain traction. Open release models can dilute incumbents' moats by reducing barriers to parity and enabling collective improvement. Ready access to state-of-the-art models enables more actors to experiment, build, and deploy novel use cases, potentially accelerating the AI adoption curve worldwide.
(New ?) Barriers
With model weights more widely available, the limiting factor shifts to access to computational resources. This is especially true as high-end GPUs and accelerators face supply constraints, in part due to escalating chip export restrictions targeting China. Thus, even as models proliferate, only those with sufficient compute can fully leverage them.
Conclusion
The immediate gains in model quality and access by Chinese labs challenge U.S. incumbents’ dominance. Open-source pushes can foster ecosystems richer and more diverse than those around closed models, influencing who shapes the next generation of applications and research. Export controls and hardware limitations now risk becoming the primary choke point for global AI progress, overshadowing the previous focus on model secrecy. These trends signal a reconfiguration of the AI competitive landscape, elevating open-source momentum and forcing U.S. firms to rethink their approaches to IP, safety, and collaboration. The trajectory will depend on how each side navigates the compute challenge and the rapidly evolving regulatory climate.
At CILC, we provide expert legal guidance on antitrust, regulatory compliance, and intellectual property across the U.S., EU, and beyond. Our platform connects clients with qualified attorneys to navigate the complexities of multiple regulatory regimes, ensuring strategic advantage in a rapidly changing digital world